I’ve read Christopher Zoukis’ 2014 book, College for convicts: The case for higher education in American prisons, and I felt compelled to quote something from his introduction. Reading this quote stopped me in my tracks because his argument is spot on. I’ve written articles that make a case for higher education in prison, which I will get to in a minute. But the point Zoukis made here deserves to be highlighted.
In the introduction to his book, Zoukis shared that although numerous studies have been undertaken, the results of which confirm the significant benefits to be gained by providing educational opportunities inside our prisons, the public continues to resist.
"People ask why Americans should pay to provide a college education to those in prison when so many law-abiding citizens struggle to send their children to school. Why should those in prison get it for free?
Moreover, if we provide a learning environment for those in prison, prison will seem “less terrible and serve as a less effective deterrent to crime.”
He’s careful to note that the deterrent argument fails. Others believe that people who commit crimes made the choice to limit their freedoms when they chose to break the law. “Therefore, handing it free to people who break the law feels wrong, feels like a slap in the face of justice,” Zoukis said.
So why, then, should we care about providing a free education to prisoners who seemingly didn’t care about the victims they hurt and the society they endangered? Here’s why according to Zoukis:
"We care, very simply, because they get out. Almost everyone who is locked up now is going to be set free one day. If we treat prisoners like animals the whole time they are locked up, that’s what we’ll get when they’re back on the streets: wild, dangerous animals. But if we educate these people, give them positive reinforcement, and introduce the idea that they will have something to offer society when they return to their communities, that’s what we’ll get when they are free: people who have something to offer society."
“Prison education programs lower recidivism rates and increase employment opportunities post-release,” says Sarah Wood, author of a 2022 article in U.S. News. Postsecondary education programs come in a variety of forms, ranging from non-credit workshops taught by volunteers to full degree-granting programs.
One program called TUMI, short for The Urban Ministry Institute, offered by World Impact, offers a four-year seminary-level education intended to equip men and women for service in the ministry field who might not otherwise be able to afford a seminary degree. It was during my research interviewing incarcerated men and women who were students in the program that I learned how much of an impact prison education can make.
College in prison lower recidivism rates. I was there to evaluate the effectiveness of the TUMI program, and I learned that it does far more than lower recidivism rates...it changes the person and the prison culture.
One man I met during my research, David McMillan, was there serving a life sentence.
In 1993, at a noted after-dark meeting place for homosexuals in East Texas, a group of three men, one aged 29, the “ringleader,” and two others, aged 19 and 17, abducted a 23-year-old man named Nicholas West from the park and drove him down a rural road in their pickup. After forcing West to remove his clothes, and several minutes of untold torture, the three men shot West to death. West was abducted from a park in Tyler, Texas, taken to a gravel pit outside of town, shot nine times, and left to die ( UPI, 2003). The three were arrested shortly after the incident, and they were sentenced to life in prison.
McMillan, one of the three, just 17 at the time of the crime, was now well into his 29th year of his life sentence. He was part of a group interview as part of my research into the effectiveness of the TUMI theological training program in prison in which he was a student.
The participants I interviewed that day shared how their lives had been changed through their TUMI education with statements such as, “I used to be a speed addict alcoholic wife-beater. Now I’m a worship leader ministering man of God-Amen!”
One participant said, “I was immature, frozen by insecurities, and had no faith in anything when I went to prison. God, through TUMI, the church, and others He placed in my path, gave me a new identity.”
David McMillan summed it up quite well. I asked participants to tell me how being a part of TUMI had made a difference in their lives. David said, “It’s changed what I’m livin’ for!” (I love this statement so much that I want to use it as the title of a book where I share detailed testimonies of some of the men I met during those interviews.)
McMillan, in particular, shared how being a part of TUMI “gives a man hope.” He said, “You have to give the people hope. Because if people have no hope, then it’s ‘get up in the morning and have no kind of guidance.’ They look up to the toughest dudes and try to imitate them. But when you have people like the men in this classroom, who are walking and shedding light everywhere they go, then they have something positive to follow. There’s a better way to live, and it’s like this.”
“The benefits of educating prisoners are numerous. For example, education can aid prisoners’ personal development and improve their sense of well-being, thereby contributing to an improved prison environment for prisoners and staff alike. In addition, it can help to reduce the financial cost of re-offending and the number of victims of crime, thus helping prisoners with their successful reintegration back into society” (Klementowski, 2020).
The evidence is clear: TUMI is responsible for the drastic change I observed in people like David McMillan.
So, yes, we should provide educational opportunities to those who are incarcerated!
This report was part of a larger evaluation project. To learn more about how we can help your organization make a bigger impact in the community through program evaluation, get in touch today. Learn more about our program evaluation services.