Blog Layout

Part One: Criminogenic Risk Factors

Robin LaBarbera • May 02, 2022

Recidivism has long plagued America's prison system.

 

A ten-year study from the Department of Justice in 2018 found that two thirds (66%) of prisoners released were arrested within three years and four out of five were arrested within ten.


Incarceration

The U.S. has the highest incarceration rate in the world. “At the end of 2019, there were just under 2.1 million people behind bars in the U.S., including 1.43 million under the jurisdiction of federal and state prisons and roughly 735,000 in the custody of locally run jails. That amounts to a nationwide incarceration rate of 810 prison or jail inmates for every 100,000 adult residents ages 18 and older,” say the experts at Pew Research Center.

 

A large body of research has shown that “punishment, incarceration, and other sanctions do not reduce recidivism and, in fact, increase offender recidivism slightly” (GEO Reentry Services). 

 

Re-entry

Recently the federal government announced an initiative that allocates $145 million to developing "reentry plans" for incarcerated persons, which would connect them to resources, such as jobs, housing, and loans upon being released.

 

Indeed, people who get out of prison need jobs and housing. Education is another important component of promoting successful re-entry. 

 

In fact, research shows that providing educational opportunities to prisoners could be the most effective way to reduce recidivism. When prisoners take some college classes, they are 43% less likely to be re-incarcerated than those who do not. Prisoners who earn an Associate’s degree are around 85% less likely to return to prison, while those who receive a Bachelor’s degree are more than 95% less likely.

 

Criminogenic Factors

The factors that are most strongly correlated to criminal behavior and are the best predictors of recidivism are called criminogenic risks. Research around criminogenic risks has identified eight factors most strongly correlated with future criminal behavior, such as:


  1. Antisocial Cognition: The values, beliefs, feelings, and cognitions that contribute to personal identity that favor and reinforce criminal behaviors. Cognitive thinking errors like self-interest, minimization of prosocial activities, denial of responsibility for behavior, and deviant thoughts about criminal activity are included. 
  2. Antisocial Personality: These are patterns of impulsive sensation-seeking behaviors, risk-taking, manipulation, exploitation, low self-control, easily persuaded by environmental or situational factors, and little constraint from risky or criminal behavior. These people can be habitually deceitful, irresponsible, aggressive, violent, impulsive, and have little remorse for their mistreatment of others.
  3. Antisocial Peers/Associates: Preferences for association with pro-criminal peers.
  4. Antisocial Behavior: Exhibits behaviors that are explosive, aggressive, or harmful behaviors towards others.
  5. Family Disfunction: Family conflicts, stressors, and displays of antisocial values in the family can contribute to an individual’s negative and harmful ways of thinking and acting.
  6. Substance Abuse: Use and abuse of alcohol and/or drugs.
  7. School/Work Issues: Poor performance in school and limited engagement, and a lack of employment stability/achievement.
  8. Antisocial Leisure/Recreation: Lack of prosocial leisure activities.

 

So, what is the answer to the problem of recidivism? “What works” to break the cycle of repeat offending? I believe many currently existing second chance programs are good, but only when they are combined with addressing the cognitive and emotional factors that lead to criminal behavior in the first place and that encourage individual behavior changes.

 

What Works for Recidivism

One could reason that programs that are designed to target more than one of the factors on the above list would be most likely to reduce recidivism. 

 

GEO Reentry Services explained in their “What Works” publication that, of the eight listed above, the three that have the most significant impact on future recidivism are antisocial cognition, antisocial personality, and antisocial associates; these should be considered the primary intervention targets. Because family factors can also be considered a major influence, especially for juvenile offenders, together these are considered The Big Four -- the four most influential criminogenic factors. The next four needs (substance abuse, employment, education, and leisure) are also important, but should generally be considered the secondary targets for intervention, according to GEO Reentry Services.

 

In the next segment of this series, we’ll talk about how an organization that is working behind bars to combat criminogenic factors is finding success among participants in their program. 

 

Read part two here


Peer Support and Self-Awareness (Shutterstock)
By Robin LaBarbera 12 Mar, 2024
Self-awareness is becoming aware of our thoughts and feelings. By understanding ourselves, we are better positioned to understand others and help them in their healing journey. As peer supporters, self-awareness is essential to preparing to encounter those we support, their families, and the system and support our peers in reentry.
writing successful grant proposals (Credit: Shutterstock)
By Robin LaBarbera 08 Jan, 2024
Grant proposals describe your organization’s mission, how you plan to use grant funds, your program's goals and objectives, a timeline for completion of the project, and an expected outcome. However, a grant proposal must be written in such a way as to convince potential funders of the value and impact of your project. At LaBarbera Learning Solutions, we’ve helped our clients write several successful grant proposals. In this guide, we’ll share with you 8 tips we’ve learned about what it takes to create a winning proposal.
belongingness behind bars (Shutterstock)
By Robin LaBarbera 17 Nov, 2023
The intricate link between belongingness and criminal behavior suggests that addressing the fundamental human need for connection can be a key element in the rehabilitation of those who are incarcerated.
Higher education in prison (Shutterstock)
By Robin LaBarbera 11 Sep, 2023
The evidence is clear: TUMI is responsible for the drastic change I observed in people like David McMillan. So, yes, we should provide educational opportunities to those who are incarcerated!
Active listening influences positive reentry
By Robin LaBarbera 30 Aug, 2023
By being consistently available, providing a listening ear, and showing clients that they are worth the effort they invest, peer supporters who are high-quality listeners can be key sources of positive support for formerly incarcerated men and women.
Four limiting beliefs about program evaluation (Shutterstock)
By Dr. Robin LaBarbera 03 Aug, 2023
Evaluation is a process that critically examines a program to collect and analyze information about a program’s activities, characteristics, and outcomes. Evaluation can be somewhat intimidating and threatening for those unfamiliar with its usefulness. Because of the negative stigma sometimes attached to evaluation, we feel it imperative to debunk some common myths associated with program evaluation.
Active listing transforms relationships (Shutterstock)
By Robin LaBarbera 02 Aug, 2023
While listening is a skill universally lauded, it’s rarely, if ever, explicitly taught as such. Develop this one skill and see your relationships radically transform!
By Robin LaBarbera 05 Jul, 2023
The lack of support, legal barriers, stigma, and meager wages create an intricate web of challenges that extend far beyond their sentence. In a system plagued by recidivism, where more than half struggle to find stable employment and two out of three are rearrested, the question is: How can we break this cycle and empower the formerly incarcerated to reintegrate successfully into society?
peer mentors in reentry (Shutterstock)
By Robin LaBarbera 19 Jun, 2023
Successful reentry programs give formerly incarcerated individuals the opportunity to become productive members of society and make a meaningful difference in the community by providing the support they need to access the tools, resources, and stability to rebuild their lives for the better. According to research, social support is one essential way to help break the cycle of recidivism.
Evaluating the effectiveness of peer mentoring in reentry (Shutterstock).
By Robin LaBarbera 12 Jun, 2023
If you have incorporated peer mentoring in your reentry programming, how do you know it is achieving its intended results? How do you know if it was effective in meeting the needs of your clients? Are you accomplishing what you set out to accomplish? Is the program worth the resources it costs? Increasingly, reentry programs and initiatives across the country are partnering with independent evaluators to answer these questions.
More Posts
Share by: